TWO GROOMS DOES NOT A MARRIAGE MAKE

John Hawkins, proprietor of Right Wing News, recently selected his favorite quotes from C. S. Lewis. One has a great deal of relevance with regard to President Obama’s recent embrace of homosexual marriage. “No man who says I’m as good as you believes it. He would not say it if he did...The claim to equality, outside the strictly political field, is made only by those who feel themselves to be in some way inferior. What it expresses is precisely the itching, smarting, writhing awareness of an inferiority that the patient refuses to accept. And therefore resents.” Coverage of Obama’s announcement stressed how his views evolved, but truth be told his view didn’t so much “evolve” as revolve. In 1996 when Obama first ran for the Illinois State Senate, he was a strong supporter of homosexual marriage. Now, like the earth around the sun, choose–your–own–plumbing marriage has done a complete orbit of The Obama and arrived where it began. That a peripheral question like this could have any role, however large or small, in a presidential election is yet another indicator that we live in a decadent age. Homosexual marriage is the Rosemary’s Baby of political questions: The unholy product of a union between the “living Constitution” and the “living Bible” crowd. “Living Constitution” advocates interpret the document to support whatever faculty lounge fad is currently making the rounds in intellectual circles. In the last 50 years the Constitution has gone from a document protecting individual liberty to a grimy little pamphlet protecting the sexual proclivities of the libertine set. The Bible has not fared any better. It could not be more clear on homosexual practices, yet there are clergy who take it upon themselves to breathe a little life into that dusty scroll. The Post quotes the Rev. Clement Aapengnu of St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church claiming, “Who has the authority to define what marriage is?” For starters I would have said the church does, based on the Bible, but if one doesn’t regard the Bible as the inspired word of God, then the book becomes just an ancient collection of folktales. We don’t take child–rearing advice from Hansel & Gretel, so why consult the Bible for a definition of marriage? In fact that’s pretty much the take of the Post’s “religion” columnist Lisa Miller who wrote last week, “On the specifics of what constitutes a “good” or “right” kind of family, the Scriptures offer no guidance at all.” The interesting question is why make the change now? Obama was going to carry Hollywood and San Francisco anyway, why take a chance on alienating red state voters? Each time homosexual marriage has been put before voters it has, without exception, lost. North Carolina, the most recent state to vote, ratified man–woman marriage by a landslide 61 percent. In its top–down campaign of sexual enlightenment, the media drags out various polls that show when the choice is binary between regular marriage and imitation marriage 51 percent support imitation marriage. When offered “civil unions” as a third option, support for homosexual marriage plummets to 38 percent. This, however, is not good news for social conservatives. There is essentially no difference between civil unions and marriage. Just as the marriage of male and female by a justice of the peace has all the rights and privileges of a wedding in a church, the civil union is essentially the same as heterosexual marriage. Even worse, as we saw in California, once they get “civil unions” the homosexual lobby terms it “second class” marriage and uses its existence to prove discrimination in the courts. You don’t have to be a Wal–Mart shopper to fall prey incoherent thinking with regard to homosexuals and the family. Mitt Romney, to his credit, opposes both homosexual marriage and civil unions. But then Romney says he does not oppose two random homosexuals who decide it might be fun to play house and adopt a child without even the formality of marriage. If your basis for defining marriage is the “feelings” and “love” of the interested parties, then no coherent intellectual argument can be made to define numbers of wives or husbands and, with a bit of evolving, their ages. It’s not a slippery slope, this change is a leap into the abyss. Currently Obama reassures the religious that he supports a same–sex marriage law that is “respectful of religious liberty.” Which sounds a lot like what he said regarding forcing religious institutions to cover abortion and contraception before the passage of Obamacare and we know how that turned out. Michael R. Shannon is a public relations and advertising consultant with corporate, government and political experience around the globe. He is a dynamic and entertaining keynote speaker. He can be reached at michael-shannon@comcast.net.

KISSING FB FRIENDS GOODBYE

The motivation for this write?  Found  “fb friends” promoting Obama…so I had to kiss them goodbye. Why? Because their promotion of Obama tells me they’re so disconnected from reality that they know not how his actions harm me. I try not to entertain thoughts that maybe they do know how his actions harm  me, and get a kick out of this sick deliberateness.  
As my Mom would say whenever I dragged some guy back to the farm, “Deary, you need to have your head examined. I fail to see what you see in that worthless, lazy, rude,  no good slob. But, if you’re infatuated with him, you’re infatuated with him. There’s not a thing I can say to change your mind, for it’ll just make you more stubborn in your infatuation quest.  But for crying out loud at least have sense enough not to let him get you pregnant!  For I will not support either one of you. I have better things to do with my time and money!”  
Sometimes I’m glad Mom’s not here to witness the full blown manifestation of the danger  she foresaw 60 years ago. “Government  welfare is a bad, bad thing Ronita,” she’d say, continuing with, “Welfare is better left to communities where  it’s personalized – one on one. Keep it local. Our churches and other community organizations do the best job getting people back on their feet until they are able to support themselves and their families. This way they’ll  become self-reliant people who contribute – not take – from society.”
Mom would explain,  “The danger of government taking over this role, is that the recipients don’t know where the money comes from. It’s impersonal.  Then the less they work and the more babies they shell out, the more money this faceless entity doles out to them. And like un-weaned calves, they become so dependent on government checks, they’ll head buck and suckle the government until it’s dry. And remember, government doesn’t have its own money. Every penny it has, it gets from us.  Just another reason why the welfare of a person is best left to the community they live in. You can pin point each penny’s destination, and make sure it’s used wisely.”
Well, that’s where we are today; An impersonal government that wastes billions of dollars training too many people  to physically “bite the hands that feed them.”
Because Obama has – since birth – been a “kept man,” he has no concept of what it’s like to depend on his own hard work – or even honest work -  to pay his way. It would do him and his minions a world of good, if they walked in the shoes of job providers – for at least one month. A part of that would require their pouring every cent they’ve “honestly earned” -  into building a company, hiring managing and paying people, and working 24-7 juggling the deliberately built to be elusive  unattainable demands of federal bullies who include Unions/EPA/USDA/NEA and ESA.
At the end of one month, whatever net earnings - before paying personal bills - they have left, would be subjected to a visit from the IRS.  The IRS would state firmly, “Even though we don’t even understand the thousands of tax codes, we know damn sure you made a mistake! How?  You’re RICH! BAD, BAD boy! Now – because you’re rich  we demand you hand over all your money! BAD, BAD boy!  Here. We’ll read you your IRS bill of rights: You have NO right to re-invest that money in  your company;  you may not hire one more person unless you get Richard Trumpka’s blessing. Furthermore, we will decide how much you should pay us- even if we lie and inflate the amount. You may not have one cent to pay the orthodontist for Susie’s braces or any other personal needs. You have to get a permit from us for your personal matters, and if we don’t approve, well then TOUGH! You’ll have to figure out how you’re going to pay for those things. And if you don’t, we’ll simply destroy your credit by  reporting you to our in-house team of thug collectors. EEE HA! We got you strapped down buddy. We have visions for your private property and you. We control you!
Another federal agency would layer on that:  “We think we saw a phantom mouse near your hedge. Surely it’s a rare, jewel, about to become extinct, most precious in need of designation. So you must stop everything you’re doing while we take a look see. Never mind that  our look see will cost YOU millions. It’s YOUR fault we think we saw something we need to look at. And while we’re doing all this paper work, you may as well sign over the deeds and titles to all your private property.  We know better how to manage it for the  Common Good. Instead of growing wheat, you can sell “Made in China” calendars that have pictures of wheat to the Common Good,  after they’ve had an enjoyable experience twittering past a phantom mouse no one can see, but we know for sure has special needs.
Obama could clean up this mess and move America back on the road to good health, by simply being a Good Neighbor.
How? Well, being a Good Neighbor means “To use your own so as not to harm another.” Like Mom said, “The government doesn’t have any money. Every penny it has, it gets from you!”  So Obama could start by first identifying “that which is his own.” As a representative of the government, he’d surely  recognize, “The government owns nothing.”  And because it uses other people’s money, he should take extra care to instruct government to  use it so as not to harm another (Another includes rich, poor, ugly, pretty, black and blue, smart and dumb.).
Where does he start? Well first, he should honor an individual’s opportunity to acquire and enjoy private property, for this…is the very foundation of America.  He would issue a moratorium on all agencies to stop making regulations. He’d initiate independent audits to be completed  and brought to him within one month. He would then begin carving off every regulation that did not go through congress and threatens Constitutional private property guarantees.   He’d eliminate every regulation that “harms another and stop the practice of agency’s doling out grant monies and entitlements. He’d eliminate every agency caught with unaccounted money losses.
Any Agency that honors the congressional process, can account for every penny spent,  stops grant and entitlements, and has used its budget so as not to harm another, can remain. Agencies not meeting those requirements should be instructed to close their doors and throw away the key!
Then Obama can embrace Mr. Cain’s 999 plan, and use it to pace the abolishing  of “income” tax and installation of a consumption tax. This would necessarily drop the class warfare game like a hot potato! And everyone, regardless their income, country of origin or profession would become a participant in re-building America each time they bought something.
Lastly, Obama should demand his supporters walk in the  shoes of a job creator for one month. And at night, even if they’re bone aching tired, should be required to write each taxpayer a Thank You.
If Obama did these things, I would join his fb supporters and promote him heartily and kiss all “Hello.”

OBAMA IS VICTIM OF BUSH'S FAILED PROMISES!

By Chuck Green

Barack Obama is setting a record-setting number of records during his first term in office:

Largest budget ever. Largest deficit ever. Largest number of broken promises ever.

Most self-serving speeches ever. Largest number of agenda-setting failures ever. Fastest dive in popularity ever!

Wow ! Talk about change!

Just one year ago, fresh from his inauguration celebrations, President Obama was flying high. After one of the nation's most inspiring political campaigns, the election of America 's first black president had captured the hopes and dreams of millions. To his devout followers, it was inconceivable that a year later his administration would be gripped in self-imposed crisis.

Of course, they don't see it as self-imposed. It's all George Bush's fault !

George Bush, who doesn't have a vote in congress and who no longer occupies The White House, is to blame for it all.

He broke Obama's promise, to put all bills on the White House web site for five days before signing them.

He broke Obama's promise, to have the congressional health care negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.

He broke Obama's promise, to end earmarks.

He broke Obama's promise, to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.

He broke Obama's promise, to close the detention center at Guantanamo in the first year.

He broke Obama's promise, to make peace with direct, no precondition talks with America's most hate-filled enemies during his first year in office, ushering in a new era of global cooperation.

He broke Obama's promise, to end the hiring of former lobbyists into high White House jobs.

He broke Obama's promise, to end no-compete contracts with the government.

He broke Obama's promise, to disclose the names of all attendees at closed White House meetings.

He broke Obama's promise, for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.

He broke Obama's promise, to have chosen a home church to attend Sunday services with his family by Easter of last year.

Yes, it's all George Bush's fault! President Obama is nothing more than a puppet in the never-ending failed Bush administration. If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, all of President Obama's problems would be solved. His promises would have been kept, the economy would be back on track, Iran would have stopped its work on developing a nuclear bomb and would be negotiating a peace treaty with Israel . North Korea would have ended its tyrannical regime, and integrity would have been restored to the federal government.

Oh, and did I mention what it would be like, if the Democrats, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, didn't have the heavy yoke of George Bush around their necks? There would be no ear marks, no closed-door drafting of bills, no increase in deficit spending, no special-interest influence (unions), no vote buying (Nebraska, Louisiana ).

If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, we'd have real change by now.

All the broken promises, all the failed legislation and delay (health care reform, immigration reform) is not President Obama's fault or the fault of the Democrat-controlled Congress. It's all George Bush's fault !

Take for example the decision of Eric Holder, the president's attorney general, to hold terrorists' trials in New York City . Or his decision to try the Christmas Day underpants bomber as a civilian.

Two disastrous decisions.

Certainly those were bad judgments based on poor advice from George Bush!

Need more proof?

You might recall that when Scott Brown won the election to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts, capturing "The Ted Kennedy Seat", President Obama said, Brown's victory was the result of the same voter anger that propelled Obama into office in 2008. People were still angry about George Bush and the policies

of the past 10 years. And they wanted change.

Yes, according to the president, the voter rebellion in Massachusetts, was George Bush's fault.

Therefore, in retaliation, they elected a Republican to the Ted Kennedy seat, ending a half-century of domination by Democrats. It is all George Bush's fault !

Will the failed administration of George Bush ever end, and the time for hope and and change ever arrive ???

Will President Obama ever accept responsibility for something / anything?

(Chuck Green is a veteran Colorado journalist and former editor-in-chief of The Denver Post.)

A SMART BLOGGER

CheshireCatYesterday 04:50 AM

One November day that now seems so long ago
When I was not so smart you know
A smooth talking man came before me
And spoke of all the things he would do for the country
He would chase away all the blue
It seemed like he knew just what to do
He would heal all the wounds
And give us all silver spoons
It seemed like such a dream
I never even suspected it was all just a scheme
“Come vote for me!” he said with such a smile
“Just get high on my hope and change for a while”
But now I understand
Now, now, now I understand
He’s nothing put a malevolent destructo man

OF CORN, CHICKENS AND JUSTICE

By Ron Ewart
                                                                           March 2011
"Corn can't expect justice from a court composed of chickens." ~ African Proverb
We attended a meeting of property rights folks last night, where a discussion ensued about why property owners facing land use code violations, can't get a jury trial. Three land use attorneys had been invited to the meeting to give their perspective on the issue. It was a lively meeting where debates went back on forth about the meaning of a "jury of your peers", state law, federal law, criminal versus civil violations, etc., etc., etc. They talked about changing the law in certain areas to help landowners get a fairer shake in the legal process. They talked about the inequities of eminent domain abuse by government and how lower and higher courts have ruled on the issue of whether government can take property by eminent domain (of course they can) and what due process and just compensation really mean. What they mean is, "Government wins." Several cases were visited about how the courts and government run rough shod over the people and their "supposed" constitutional rights. It became readily apparent that court decisions tend to run all over the map. Hardly a recipe for equal treatment under the law ..... is it?
But one big giant issue was barely even touched on in the meeting and that was the exorbitant cost of the American justice system. It has exhausted the savings and bankrupted the tens of thousands who have had the misfortune of either being sued, or trying to sue government, or a private party, for some injustice inflicted upon them, or defend against something they were supposed to have done wrong.
The judicial system can be best described by the following statement: "The justice system and the courts are a stacked deck and a closed club where a bunch of over-paid ($250 to 600 per hour) men and women run the club ..... judges, lawyers and clerks. Judges and lawyers are members of the state bar association, also a closed club. There are a "zillion" rules to follow and only the lawyers and judges know the rules. It is essentally, legally sanctioned, corrupt racketeering. The insiders protect their own with a vengeance. You are an outsider and you don't know the rules, so you can't play in their club and you are not welcome if you try."
Then there is the "jury pool". A jury is described, in the profession, "as a bunch of men and women who couldn't come up with a good enough excuse to get out of jury duty." A jury of your peers? Hardly!
[NOTE: By the way, if you want to get out of jury duty, just send them a letter, when you receive their notice to appear and tell them in the letter, that you hate judges and attorneys, the legal system is absolutely corrupt and you will do everything in your power to either taint, or hang the jury. The judge, by law, will have to excuse you.]
The fact is, and any honest lawyer will tell you this, going to court is a crap shoot, at best and any particular outcome is totally unpredictable. Judges let convicted child rapists go free. Mobsters get out on technicalities and are free to rob, main and murder again. Monetary settlements, way beyond common sense and reason, are awarded to undeserving plaintiffs. Worthy plaintiffs or defendants are denied justice in the hands of corrupt lawyers, judges and juries. Attorneys win and lose over conflicting court precedents and case law. Justice is truly blind and the law is conflicting, contradictory and purposely complicated. Lawyers go on ambulance-chasing expeditions for massive class action lawsuits for medical malpractice, or other events where a class of the so-called injured can gather together in a class action. The truth is, if you are not part of the system and you aren't, then you are the "corn" and the judicial system is populated by "chickens."
We can tell you story after story of where the judicial system became a financial black hole and an emotionally draining, frustrating and stressful experience for those who sought or were confronted with so-called justice in the courts. It is especially hard on rural landowners who come up against draconian land use and environmental laws that are spawned in the distorted minds of brainwashed city dwellers and the environmental waco representatives they elect to the halls of government. It appears that this intolerable condition is only going to get worse.
Then there is the ubiquitous frivolous lawsuit. If you have ever been a victim of one of these, it has no doubt left a real sour taste in your mouth. We were one of those victims.
We sold a medical building containing over 20 or so doctors, to an investor who had a bunch of money he wanted to invest. He was experienced in managing income properties but an idiot when trying to manage a covey of doctors. In three weeks he had the doctors mad at him. In three years 10 of the doctors moved out of his building and went to another clinic, purportedly in the hopes of finding more amenable management and cheaper rent. The investor's income from the building plummeted and suddenly he found himself $10,000 a month in the hole where before he was enjoying a 14% cash-on-cash return.
So what did the aggrieved investor do? He hired a junk-yard-dog lawyer to sue us personally and the doctors, alleging we conspired to defraud him because we all knew that the doctors were going to move out in three years and leave him with a half-empty building. The allegation was blatantly false! There was no conspiracy and what happened in the three years was almost wholly the investor's fault. But he wanted to find a scapegoat for his transgressions and set his sights on those whom he thought brought him the grief.
The outcome of the case was, we incurred over $35,000 in legal fees to defend against a totally frivolous lawsuit. Even though the investor lost his case, (he had no case) we still had to mortgage our home to pay our damn lawyer. You call that justice? The only justice we got was knowing the investor not only lost his $400,000 down payment, but almost $100,000 in legal fees he had to pay to his junk-yard-dog lawyer. We managed to get one of his lawyers fired by filing a 7-page complaint with the state bar association. The doctors ended up getting the building back because they were holding the paper on which the investor defaulted.
In another case we sued, without a lawyer (we couldn't afford one), a multi-national conglomerate for "intentional infliction of emotional distress." It's a legal term. We won't go into the gory details here, but we first went to the U. S. District Court and were promptly dismissed on procedural grounds. (Too many rules we didn't know) So we took the case to Superior court and finally settled out of court. (We were learning) Yeah, we beat the multi-national conglomerate, sort of, but only because we were a fly in their soup and they just wanted to get rid of us. We must have really ticked off their attorney though, because we filed two complaints with the state bar association against him. Attorneys don't like having to explain their actions to the state bar. It uses up too much un-paid time.
Justice? Hardly! It took over a year and a half of our time, studying court rules and filing motions and briefs. What did we get? A settlement that came no where near what it cost us in lost time to prosecute our case. However, had we hired a lawyer, we would have been driven into bankruptcy from the exercise.
All across America, individuals are either forced into court because they are being sued, or decided that their only course for redress was to sue someone else. Most have paid dearly for the experience. Many lose their entire savings, exhaust their borrowing power and many more lose all of their assets. Being wealthy is no guarantee of winning either, but it helps.
Unfortunately, rural landowners are a special case. They are being forced to bear almost the entire burden of environmental protection, while their city cousins get off virtually scot-free. New environmental laws, draconian land use regulations and code violations and eminent domain abuse, hit rural landowners especially hard. The city inhabitants, through their elected lawmakers, are trying to "clean up" the rural areas to radical city standards, based on very un-scientific, made-as-instructed criteria and UN's Agenda 21. Rural landowners are having a very difficult time fighting back against these rising and unconstitutional injustices. Some give up and pay the fines and penalties. Some even go to jail. Some go to court looking for "justice" and many of those go broke for their efforts, while their attorneys and court costs bleed them dry.
Most are not aware that they can fight these injustices by themselves, if they just knew how. Using the law, the internet, a lot of courage and sometimes the power of the many, they can regain their pride, self-respect and their dignity by actually confronting and defeating government, local, state or federal, that has turned from servant to master and an arrogant master at that. We have prepared three videos, a power point presentation and loads of resource material for the property owner, city or rural, to take on government without having to hire an expensive lawyer and go to court. We call this time-tested, valuable information, "The NARLO Offense" and it is available on our website at www.narlo.org, or on our sister website at: www.narloltd.com.
Just the other day we were having a conversation with a young bank teller and we were lamenting the rise in paper work, licenses, permits and regulations to do anything these days. Her response was, "well that is just the way it is," and then added, "and if we resist the way it is, we are just anarchists." And of course with that logic the tea partiers must be anarchists, or racists, or both. It appears that logic, reason and common sense have gone the way of the Dodo bird, especially in the government-indoctrinated young. In contrast to this appeasing mindset, Barry Goldwater said, in part, "extremism, in the defense of liberty, is not a vice." We whole heartedly agree with Goldwater.
One of the ways in which the people can take back their government, is to confront and relentless pursue that government. Government wastes our money, taxes us to death, and regulates the Hell out of us. If we, as Americans, have any hope of regaining our liberty, the government must be resisted every single day by millions of Americans, or government will eventually assume absolute power. If you don't believe that is where we are headed, your head is in the clouds, or in the sand. If you want to see government take away your freedoms, dissolve American sovereignty and merge us into a global monarchy, just keep your head where it is. However, if you don't want any of this to happen, you are going to have to get your hands dirty and start fighting back.
For those with courage, "The NARLO Offense" is one way to start fighting back. http://www.narlo.org/

PRESIDENT OBAMA & CYBER

This week President Obama had dinner with an interesting group of in a private home somewhere in the San Francisco Bay Area. In attendance with our President were Apple CEO, Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz, Cisco Systems CEO John Chambers, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.
___________________________________________________

I'd say that is a fine way for The President to get himself thoroughly briefed on the cyber industry, where we heard a little while ago John McCain was learning about email and Sarah Palin is a twitterer with the mind of a Jr.High cheerleader. (He was pissed Secret Service wouldn't let him keep his private Blackberry.) He met with leaders in the technology, software, business, and social utilization of the most important piece of technical infrastructure in 21st Century America. Those people's expertise and enterprises are as important to what is going on today as railroads were 150 years ago. Whether or not we find a way to dispense with the ICBM's, the utilization of the world-wide data-grid loosely called the Internet will make all the difference in global influence. When Japan's homes have 40megs of streaming video, and the fastest I can get here in Albuquerque is 8 even if we are a leading high-tech research state, I don't feel we're being competitive. Developing national media hardware (big optic lines, like national highways), greater cooperation and standardization among freely-competing market powers, keeping the use of it fully First Amendment Free (protecting it from policing by the paranoids, puritans, and propagandists), and learning the implications of using social media as part of our ongoing democratic process sounds very intelligent to me, Mr President!
Hopefully, he went to that dinner to suck those people's heads like a coonass at a bayoo bug bar.

\:--] James Post

www.postpubco.com/anticyclops.htm

AN OPEN LETTER TO MY FELLOW AMERICANS

By Michael Connelly


It seems that every two years the politicians from both the Republican and Democrat parties declare that the upcoming election will be a defining moment for America. Yet, until now, I have never believed that. However, the elections that will take place in November 2010 will decide whether the United States of America will survive as a democratic republican form of government where the rights of individuals are paramount, or become a socialist form of government where the rights of the people are abolished in favor of an all powerful government where individuals are now subjects of an elitist group.
Our forefathers had all experienced this type of elitist form of government in Europe and they specifically rejected it in 1776 when they adopted the Declaration of Independence and in 1787 when they wrote the U.S. Constitution. This lead us to create a country that for over 200 years has been the most prosperous nation on the planet and served as a shining example of liberty to the rest of the world. Yet, now it is in the process of being destroyed by so-called progressives who believe that most Americans are too stupid to control their own destiny and must be led by those who are more enlightened.
So, who am I that rejects this concept? That’s simple, I am an American. Note that I am not a hyphenated American. I am not an Irish - American, an African - American, or a Mexican - American. I am just an American. My family arrived in this country in 1756 and we have fought in every war since the American Revolution. My father landed on Utah Beach during the invasion of Normandy, I am a former officer in the U.S. Army, and I have four sons, two of them are veterans and two others are currently on active duty with the Army.
Yet, while they and their fellow soldiers, sailors, marines, and air force personnel risk their lives to defend the Constitution of the United States from terrorists who would destroy our nation, they have to deal with the fact that our Constitution and our freedoms are being taken away by the very people who have ordered them to fight.
We are led by a President of the United States who has never served in the military and openly shows his disdain for the limitations placed on him by the Constitution. He is backed up by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the leaders in Congress who continue to ram through legislation that is clearly unconstitutional and limits our rights as free Americans despite the fact that most of what they are doing is opposed by the majority of us.
I track every piece of legislation being introduced into Congress and what I see is appalling. All ten of the first amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, are under attack, if not by Congress than by left wing Federal judges and the so-called Czars illegally appointed by Obama in violation of the Constitution.
However, when we raise our voices as a free people against what is happening we are attacked as bigots or racists even though none of our concerns have anything to do with race, religion, or ethnicity. These attacks are echoed by the so-called mainstream news media who no longer provide news coverage, but have instead become propaganda organs for the Obama administration. In fact, a group of these left wing news members have actually been exchanging emails about ways to get the government to shut down news organizations such as Fox News that report what is really happening.
Everyone needs to understand what is occurring here. If this November we do not elect enough people who support our Constitution to the House of Representatives and Senate the fight may be lost. The elections in 2012 may occur too late to save our Republic. The bottom line is this: we must turn out the votes in November to save our freedom. If we don’t then our free market economy will be destroyed and our liberties as a free people under our Constitution will be destroyed. Contact your friends, neighbors, and family members and let them know what is at stake this November. We owe this to our children and grandchildren.
God Bless you all and God Bless the United States.
Michael Connelly
http://www.michaelconnelly.viviti.com/
mrobertc@hotmail.com